Don’t Be Careful

I just spent the weekend with my grandchildren: Alexis, three and a half, and her brother, Gavin, 9. The negative rules of our house are: no TV, no electronics, and no snacks. The positive rules of the house are: play table games a lot, talk a lot, read a lot, and generally explore the world outside a whole lot. Deb and I are blessed with a house on the edge of our little town of Lodi behind which is a kind of city storage area where there are huge mounds of gravel, road tar, blocks of various kinds, sand, and dirt. We call this our “west 40” (actually about an acre), as compared to our “south 40” (about a half-acre), and the “north 40” where we store all kinds of firewood. For the grandkids, however, the west 40 is “the park.” It is the favorite place to go and play when they are with us. We also frequent the nearby creek where we play “boats”, namely throwing pine cones into the creek to see whose “boat” goes the farthest. Gavin and I also play “swords,” namely picking up some sticks and attacking each other…well, usually just attacking our opponent’s “sword.” We used to play “whips” made of small branches from a local weeping willow, but alas, the tree was cut down. Nevertheless, we have this array of outside thing to so when the kids are here in addition to swinging on our homemade swings in our back yard, and occasional walks around the neighborhood, which happens to be Alexis’ second favorite activity after the “park” “mountains.”

 

I have been thinking about writing this “Don’t be Careful” for some time because I so often hear, “Be Careful!” coming out of the mouthers of parents speaking to their children. Now at 70 my exact memory for my childhood is fading, but I don’t remember hearing many “Be Careful” words from my parents. We lived on “the lake” (as Lake Wisconsin is known in these parts), a great place for being outside. My brother Bill and I, often together with our neighbor, John, used to swim, boat, and water ski. We would sometime swim to “the island,” which I suppose was maybe 200 meters from our shore, and perhaps a bit scary when you are halfway or so. But the more challenging things we did on the water had to do with the boat. We weren’t irresponsible with racing the boat into dangerous places; it wasn’t our style. We did, however, “ski” with various things that are not exactly designed as water skis, like logs and tables. The logs didn’t really work, as I remember, because as soon as the boat gained a bit of speed, the log would go directly under water carrying it’s rider with it. The table, however, worked a bit better, upside down, of course. It took a bit of maneuvering to ride this table/ski because an upside down table is, perhaps not the most stable of things, and not, perhaps truly designed as a water toy. We tried various kinds of tables, finding the round ones best. One of the round tables, however, was metal, and we soon found out that it didn’t float for long, and when it tipped, it was worse than the log. I don’t recall if my mother knew of our odd activities on the lake, but if she did, she didn’t say “Be Careful”. I think she trusted us. Perhaps more importantly, she just expected that we would be careful. More important yet, she wanted us to have a good time and explore the world we lived in, which happened to be a lake. Bill and I survived, and I think we were all the better for it. Yah, we broke a few things, got a few scratches, and challenged a bit of life. Once Bill broke a water ski coming off a water ski jump. He survived.

 

My weekend with the grandkids was without Grandma who was in parts West including Santa Fe for a conference and God knows where after the conference hiking canyons and visiting Native American cliff dwellers. It was a bit of work being alone with the kids but not so much as I let them do a lot of things on their own or with minimal supervision. For instance, in the “park” (read, city gravel and sand storage area back of our house), the kids love to run up the “mountains” and try to be king or queen of the mountain. To my surprise, they both wanted to slide down, including the gravel mountains. Ouch. Somehow they didn’t get scratched up, and their little butts seemed no worse for the wear after these experiences. I did wonder how Mom might have responded as they were sliding down these hills of sand and gravel. And I wondered more about Mom when Gavin decided to throw stones in the neighborhood of his sister, trying to get close but not hit her. Should I say, “Be careful, Gavin, not to hit your sister?” or should I just let him throw stones hoping that he doesn’t hit her? I went for the hope. I found it a bit of a challenge to avoid the “Be careful” words that certainly sound more like an invective than an instruction.

 

I think “Be careful” should be replaced with, “Be courageous.” Helping kids learn to be courageous rather than being careful might help them overcome the irrational fears and undue fear that so many kids seem to have these days. Being courageous means willing to do something that might result in a reward rather than in safety. “Safety first” might be a good sign to have when working with high voltage equipment, but I don’t think it should be the first instruction when kids decide to do something, like swing high on a swing, run into a forest, or slide down a mountain of gavel. The etymology of the word courage comes from the French word for heart (cuer). So “courage” means something like, “take heart” or “trust your heart.” When I trust my heart, I am not always right, and I am not always safe. But when I engage in heart-based courage, I just might improve my heart while conquering undue fear of the unknown.

 

There is something very important and very special about the unknown, largely because there is a lot more unknown than there is known. Estimates are that we understand less than one per cent of the functioning of our 100 billion celled brains, and neuropsychologists continue to work on increasing those percentages while knowing that it will be centuries, millennia, or never before we really understand how the brain works. It is the unknown that stimulates science of all kinds. It is the unknown, as well as the scary, that gets us to go into haunted houses on Halloween. It is the unknown that helps us discover cures for Ebola and other diseases. But when we face the unknown, we will always to scared…or will we be excited…or will we be courageous?

 

So what about the caveat to my challenge to the “Be careful!” expressions. Shouldn’t be want our kids to be careful so they don’t get hurt? Shouldn’t we want them to avoid broken bones? Shouldn’t we want them to be alive rather than dead from some foolish experiment? Yes to all these questions: we want them safe, we want them alive, and we don’t actually want them to be hurt. The problem as I see it, however, is that we have sacrificed most of the “Be courageous” for the “Be careful!” And as a result we have a lot more care than we have cuer. We need to be hurt in order to prevent further hurt. But more importantly, we need hurt in order to realize that hurt is necessary in life. More important yet, we need hurt in order to rise above hurt and not be stifled by it. We need hurt that comes from courageous actions, whether going over a water ski jump, sliding down a hill of gravel, or walking in an unknown woods. If we sacrifice too much courage for too much safety, we are impaired both in vision and in action.

 

So let’s be practical. How should a parent deal with a child who is about to do something that might be hurtful to him/herself or to someone else. My answer, for the most part, is to watch…at a bit of a distance. I think parents would find that in most circumstances the child will be safe. In some circumstances, the child will be physically hurt. In other circumstances, the child will be emotionally hurt. And, of course, in some circumstances the child will suffer some kind of more serious harm. We don’t want to put our kids in “harm’s way” but we actually do want to put our kids in “hurt’s way” so they can learn to live with hurt, learn to recover from hurt, and learn that hurt is not the same as harm. Fear of hurt is a much worse condition than hurt itself.

 

I was afraid of being hurt in football, so as a result I was never very good at football. My brother, on the other hand, was not afraid of being hurt, and became quite good. He also came home after one game with a broken front tooth derived from an illegal block by his opponent. I was quite upset, being a boy who was too afraid of being hurt, but Bill said that after the illegal block, he got so mad at his opponent that he played his best game ever. Was his “best game ever” worth the broken tooth? I think it was. I never broke any teeth, much less legs or arms, but I was never any good in football. I played for four years but never lettered in the sport, rightfully so. I just didn’t have what it took to be a good football player: courage…courage to be unafraid of hurt.

 

I saw a young man of 18 about a year ago who was not going anywhere in his life. He said that he really wanted to be a football player, and evidently had a natural skill at it. But his mother refused to allow him to play because he had only one kidney due to some kind of birth defect. So he never played football. And he never did anything else either, eventually falling into illicit drug use and generally finding little purpose in life. I have to wonder: might his life been better had he played football even though he might have lost his remaining kidney, or worse yet, died as a result of an injury? How many kids have kidney injuries in football? Some? Yes. Many? No. Should his parents waived their own worry about their son getting hurt in football for the promise that he might actually gain some self-esteem from it? This is a judgment call that most parents would make against football. I am not too sure that was the right call. Perhaps his parents might have helped him find some other way to challenge life, be courageous, and experience necessary hurt so that he could find his place in life.

 

Courage is not jumping right in “where angels fear to tread” but sometimes it is jumping in where we pray, “May angels and ministers of grace protect us” as Shakespeare suggested as quoted by Bones in Star Trek IV.

Water and Other Simple Things

Water. So simple. So necessary. So easily neglected. I will never take water for granted again. It has been a blessing (recently) and a curse (in the past).

It started about six months ago. More accurately, it started several years ago. Much more accurately, it started 15 years ago. But back to the present and the recent past. We have had some serious troubles with…water…for the last six months or more. Like many people in Wisconsin, we had some freezing pipes problems during this very long, very cold winter. Specifically, the pipe that runs water to our office/barn, running underground from our house to the barn, froze sometime late December of this year, about the time Deb and I were wandering around the Southwest enjoying our travels in various national parks, canyons, and Native American cliff dwellings. Well, we didn’t entirely enjoy the trip because our Hybrid SUV, with its 186,000 miles, had some disturbing messages leading us to stop at no less than three Ford dealerships on the way. But I am getting off track. I could have written about “Cars” instead of Water, but that is another story.

Water. How central is that in our lives. We are born out of an environment composed largely of water. We, as human beings, are, as one Star Trek episode said of us, “bags of mostly water,” about 75% I think. What an odd thing, being a “bag of mostly water” walking around, talking, doing, dreaming, and the like. How is that possible? But again, I am off track from the “water problem.” We came back from this lovely dry climate of the U.S. Southwest to the equally lovely, but also cold and wet Midwest, arriving just after the New Year. We arrived to find our water in the office/barn had frozen. Now this is not good. It is not a good thing to have frozen water in your office where people coming in for psychological services have enough on their minds, and would rather not worry about  the sink not working or the toilet not flushing. So, being the good doer/caretaker I am, I put some buckets of water in the office rest room for people to use when flushing the toilet and some hand cleanser. Surely, I thought, this would take care of things until our predictable thaw of the ground in February, maybe late January. Surely, it will thaw. January finished, February came, and no thaw. Well, we certainly will get to early March, and it will thaw. March came, and no thaw. How awful, do we have to wait until July for goodness sake?

While we are not-to-patiently waiting for the water to thaw, things actually got worse. What is worse than not having water flowing? Having the drain freeze. How could a 4 inch drain freeze when water flows downhill? I figured out that the “condensate” from the furnace slowly dripped into the drain, and over a month or two slowly froze all four inches of the drain. Now I am in a real fix. And on top of that I didn’t realize that the drain was frozen until sewage started seeping up into the utility basin in the garage, which is right under the office/barn. Oh great! Exactly how will I deal with this? You don’t want to know. You really don’t want to know. Consider buckets, dipping buckets, carrying buckets, and dumping buckets in the woods. That is about all you want to know. So it is about this time that we decide that we need a clean out in the drain system so that we can somehow unfreeze the drain. This took a lot of work, including digging 4 feet under concrete, sand, gravel, and a lot of stones to get to the drain, and then to the water line. Finally, we got the drain to work. That was April. But still no water.

Awe, certainly the water will simply unfreeze, and we will be back in business. It did unfreeze, but unfortunately, when it unfroze, it broke the pipe. Here is where this last 6 months really relates to the last 15 years. Fifteen years ago I, an unaccomplished plumber, put the pipe underground, along with natural gas, drain, and electric. But I did what I often do: I did it cheaply. I put the water in ¾ inch PVC. A lot of guys would have put the underground pipe in copper, or CPVC, or stronger PVC. Not me. So now we have PVC pipe leaking somewhere four feet underground. I do what I do best: I just do it. I found the (apparent) leak, repaired it, and put new pipe to the break. Then, trusting that the leak was prepared, we covered this 4×6 feet hole with sand, gravel, stones, etc. and covered all that with concrete, replete with Deb’s decorative stones in the concrete. And off to the cabin with the relief that this whole water mess was finally finished.

After our brief respite at the cabin, as we came back home and pulled into the driveway, I noticed what seemed to be a stream of water coming from the office/barn. Surely, this couldn’t be. I had fixed the pipe, right? Wrong. Evidently, the pipe had again broken, and we had been leaking ¾ inch of water for…how many days? We found out when the next water bill came in together with a note that explained why out bill was 5x more than normal. They wondered if we had a leaky faucet. Not exactly. Now we are looking at this concrete leaking water and decide we need to do something more permanent. What could that be?

We start with hiring the son of a basketball player friend of mine, a young man, by the way who worked well beyond the $10/hr. I offered him, so I had to increase his pay to $15/hr. He dug the same hole, now bigger and deeper. And we thought: is it possible that we could somehow avoid digging a 100 foot trench through our yard, 5 or 6 feet down. Well, maybe. Perhaps we could use “Pex” piping that we had put in the barn/office a few years back when we had a different leak (and flood of our entire office). Yes, we could use Pex, but could be actually push it through the ¾ PVC? It just might work. Long story short, we tried it, and it seemed to work; we pushed this Pex pipe through the PVC and it went well until, boom. It stopped. We must have run into some kind of bend, 90 degree or 45 degree, or something about halfway through the yard. OK, we can do this. Let’s just dig a 6 foot by 6 foot hole in the middle of our backyard and find the angle of the PVC. No luck. Nice hole, however. Time to go to bed and sleep on this problem.

Thank goodness for my “analyst” wife. In the middle of the night, she thought (analyzed) that we might somehow shave off some of the end of the Pex pipe and create some kind of loose end that might…just might…get through the PVC angle. So down in the basement again, and we did just that: shaved off a few inches of the Pex, and pushed it through the pipe. It went further. A bit harder to push, but it was moving. Or was it bending. I stopped pushing for a moment, but Deb insisted: just keep on pushing, you! OK, I’ll push. I pushed, and then it stopped. Could it be that it came into the garage 100 feet away? I don’t know, but I hoped. “Deb, why don’t you go to the garage and see if, by some wild chance and by God’s grace, the Pex has found its way to the garage.” I waited. No word. I came upstairs, and I saw Deb standing 100 feet away from me in the 4 foot hole in the garage smiling…and flashing her…reasts at me. I got the message. The Pex was through. I couldn’t believe my eyes…. How wonderful…to have water again…and for other things.

Just to put one more anticlimax to this story, we were able to push the Pex through the final 15 feet of PVC so we didn’t have to tear up another 10 feet of concrete. And in the process I ripped my finger open as I pulled the pipe through. It just didn’t matter. And as I type today, my finger is still recovering two weeks past this last water event. It is a reminder to me that God was, indeed graceful in giving us water, albeit by our work and Deb’s ideas, but Grace nevertheless, which is what I think/feel when I see this damaged finger.

Water. How basic. How necessary. I will never take it for granted again. I wonder how much else I take for granted: electricity, natural gas, gasoline, house, family, friends, peace, and safety. There is something very special, and oddly, very spiritual, about our now having our water problem solved. It is humbling. It is a reminder.

I need a glass of water. How great that I can just turn the faucet on and get a glassful.

 

Mother’s Job is Done

We have too much mothering in this country. Mothering of all kinds including biological mothers, fathers and others who for one necessary reason or another act as “mothers” to their children, government providing a kind of mothering too people who act like children, single mothers who have no choice but to continue to be mothers doing the best they can, and a general mood of fear that is so pervasive these days and seems to call for the security of mother. I’d like to call for an end to undue mothering and replace it with fathering, and then with personal responsibility. Let me explain…or have I already lost my audience?

The security of mother

Let me start this sermonette by stating that I think there is nothing so central to life as mothers, in whatever form they come. Biological mothers do nine months of work before their children even breathe, and God love them for that work. I have no idea what it is like to carry a developing child inside of my body, but at the very least I have a sense that something truly special occurs during these nine months. I truly wonder what happens, what it is like, for both mother and developing child to have this kind of union where mother cares for her child at a natural, biological, and possibly a spiritual level. Since I have been a (small) part of the births of my children, I have at least seen the wonder of breathing life beginning along with the wonder of mother and child together as God means it to be. I yet muse over those moments 35 and 40 years ago and am moved by the beauty.

I want to make a brief point here about what a “mother” is as I have suggested in my introductory paragraph. Most mothering comes from biological mothers, which will be my primary thrust in this blog. But I would extend my generic view of what a “mother” is to include anyone who provides basic security to children, and then would extend this idea of “mothering” a bit beyond the raising of children. “Mothers” (or “mother figures”) could be grandmothers, aunts, or other females, or they could be fathers, uncles, or grandfathers. I consider the providing of security and nurturance “mothering” however it comes and whoever renders these things to children.

My belief is that mothers provide basic security to children. This providing of security begins in the womb and continuing afterward for some time. Most mothers provide this basic security to their children, perhaps first in the womb, and then perhaps at the breast, and further into infancy and toddlerhood as children explore the world more and yet need nearly constant care and security. If a child does not receive this rather constant care and security, the child will be hurt physically, or possibly even die. Equally important, however, is that a child that does not feel the security of mothering will never feel secure in the world unless that child finds a way to develop it in adulthood. Much of psychotherapy has to do with providing this basic mothering security to people so that they can find a deeper security inside of themselves.

Mothering also means providing nurturance. Simply stated, this nurturance begins in the womb, continues at the breast and later with assisted eating, and culminates with children knowing how to feed themselves. Nurturing has largely to do with food, but there is also a deep nurturing that comes with physical touch that a mother figure ideally provides. Thus, if a child feels the security of mother and the nurturance of mother, that child will be able to engage the world with a sense that the world is largely safe as well as a place of adventure and accomplishment.

There is nothing as basic as mothering. There is nothing more important. If I don’t have proper mothering, nothing else works because there is not a sense in the person that the world is safe and that one can make it in the world with achievement and challenge. Most people grow up without a feeling of internal security, which means that they have not been provided with the mothering that they needed and hence have not progressed to the point of internal personal security. But there is more than nurturance and security to life, to success, and to happiness.

The place of father(ing)

Fathers or father substitutes provide a bridge, namely a bridge between the safety and security of mother to the relatively insecure world. If fathers do their due in life they help their children face the challenges of the world that have to do with work, play, success, and relationships. Right off the bat it might seem odd that I would place “relationships” as something fathers do because it seems obvious that most fathers have little understanding of such things. I would agree that most fathers haven’t been good over the years at helping their children formulate relationships. Ideally, however, a father would slowly and patiently help a child move away from the nearly absolute safety of having hovering mother to a place where there is no mother, where there is little or no external security, namely the real world.

As I have said of biological mothers, I will say of biological fathers. A father doesn’t have to be biological. He doesn’t even have to be a he. “He” can be grandmother, aunt, or mother. Anyone who provides this bridge from security to adventure is doing fathering. In some societies, usually “primitive”, fathering is done by a biological uncle, a grandfather, or an “elder.” The person who provides the bridge into adventure is doing fathering.

Fathers who successfully help their children bridge into the real world do so with three elements: encouraging, challenging, and sacrificing. A man (generically speaking) who helps his child bridge into the world needs to encourage first. Encouragement is something like saying, “Look, you have been secure for a while with your mother. You now have the ability and freedom to look into the world and see what you can accomplish.” Encouragement itself is a bridge because it suggests that security is good and now is the time to do something while feeling secure…but perhaps not too sure what that might mean. After encouragement a father needs to challenge. Challenging is something like saying or implying, “You can do this. I know you can do this. You might fail or you might succeed, but you need to try to do this. You need to do this because the world is a wonderful place and there are wonderful things to see and do, so you need to get up and go.” A properly challenged child feels that he has felt safe with mother, has felt encouraged by father, and now feels the desire to do something.

Fathering doesn’t end with encouraging and challenging. The third element of fathering is sacrifice. A father who sacrifices for his child is one who loves his child more than he loves himself. He occasionally sees the need to give up on what he wants for the sake of meeting what his child needs. Sacrificing can come in the form of buying something for his child instead of himself, giving time to his child instead of himself, or on a rare occasion, placing himself in some kind of danger for the protection of his child.

A child who has inadequate fathering does not do anything significant in the world. Such a child never bridges beyond the security of mother. As a result a child without sufficient encouragement, challenge, and sacrifice ends up without the tools “to face triumph and disaster and treat those two imposters the same” as Kipling said in his poem. There can be too much fathering, but this is rare because good fathering tends to help children get beyond the need for encouragement, challenge, and sacrifice and find their own success and achievement in life.

Too much mothering

Our culture provides too much mothering and not enough fathering. I blame both mothers and fathers for this tragedy, but mostly fathers. It is tragic that 73% of African American children are born out of wedlock, and the large majority of the children in these families are raised without functional father in the home. It is equally tragic that 50% of Latino children and that 25% of White children are born out of wedlock, but there tends to be more active involvement of fathers in these latter two categories. But it is not so much the born out of wedlock that I am concerned about. I am more concerned with the difficulty that children have bridging into the world of adventure and success because they can’t seem to get away from the need for security.

A major problem has to do with the single Moms out there, and the sort of single Moms who have husbands and partners who are not really part of the family. The challenge for many women, and most specifically for single mothers, is to change from being a person who provides basic security to a person who provides adventure. I don’t think any woman makes this change easily. I don’t think it is natural, meaning that it is not natural to be a person providing security and nurturance to a person who provides encouragement, challenge, and sacrifice. This is not women’s fault. Women have a more natural orientation towards security than men do (usually), and have great difficulty setting this nurturing/security orientation aside for a very different approach to children. Rarely, are mothers able to manage this change in orientation. They either provide too much security, and usually rescuing, or they provide some kind of complaint that their children are not doing anything while all the time providing security and nurturing to these children, who may, indeed, be in their 20’s and 30’s.

In my mind it comes down to moving away from external security into adventure, and then into internal security. As long as I have a mother who is providing external security, I will not be able to reach into the world, experiment with my abilities and interests, and figure out what the world is and what I can do in it. If I have a mother (remember, or mother substitute) continuing to provide me security from the outside, I will not have the opportunity to develop internal security. 

Too much mothering also comes from other sources beyond a biological mother or a mother substitute. A culture or government that provides security but does not provide challenge and adventure is just at fault as is the ever present mother or the usually absent father.

The simple solution

The solution to the problem is that we have too much mothering and too little fathering. This is simple but it is not easy. It is very hard. This means that (1) men need to understand what they as men (or women) need to do is to encourage, challenge, and sacrifice, (2) women need to allow men to help their children bridge into adventure, which is always unsafe to some degree, and (3) our culture needs to encourage children to experiment in the world finding what they have to offer the world.

But this is another topic, namely helping people find their gifts, talents, and abilities rather than their weaknesses, limitations, and so-called problems.