relationships

Loving and Liking I: Not the Same

Ron Johnson Connection, emotional maturity, family, Feelings, relationships, Self-Awareness

Loving and Liking I: Not the Same

Some people are just easy to love. They attract your love for many reasons, but it isn’t necessary what they say or do: they’re just lovable. They’re like little kittens or puppies. I’m reminded of being with our grandson a couple years ago at Bear Country while the three of us were on a national parks’ journey out west. First we drove through the real bear country, like the Black Hills and Yellowstone, but we didn’t find any. Besides, you get a little worried when you’re looking for Grizzlies in some back country. Better to pay your way to Bear Country in South Dakota where you drive through this park with all kinds of dangerous bears just hanging out doing their thing. Then you come to the “nursery” where the baby cubs are romping around with one another, and you are compelled to jump over the fence and romp with them. We didn’t. But these not-yet-dangerous animals were lovable.

 Lovability

Some people are just like that: lovable. You know the kind. There’s something about these lovable people that is some kind of special gift they have. They’re not trying to be lovable; they just are. You can’t help it. For the most part babies are just lovable, and a lot of young kids are the same way. But these adults who are lovable are a special breed. We call these folks “lovers” in temperament, which we want to discuss in a later blog, but for now let’s just say that they’re just lovable.

Aside from the lovable baby bear cubs, kittens and puppies, and human babies, there is another phenomenon that occurs, mostly in families. We love our relatives. Especially our children. It just happens. How did I love my daughters the first second they were delivered? I was astounded with my feelings of love for my daughters when there were just delivered. Couldn’t help it. Couldn’t stop it if I wanted to. And the love I had for each of them has remained solid now for 44 and 40 years and counting.

 Liability

Why do we like someone? There are many reasons but largest among them is some facet of life that is shared. This could be a shared political, religious, or philosophical belief, or it could be a shared passion for some activity like sports, music, working on cars, or hiking. We may also like someone because that person makes me laugh…or even cry. Liking is actually harder to develop or find that love because it means we have to find that piece of life that we share. People who like the Packers, for instance, might actually come from very different philosophical perspectives, but when they are watching a Packer game and drinking beer, it is only what they like that really matters. Sometimes liking simply has come from familiarity. You just know someone for a long time, say a spouse, and you like that you can predict when your friend will do something.

Liking is the essence of friendship. Furthermore, you can stop liking someone and you certainly can end a relationship with someone with whom you now have less in common. It can be problematic if you yet love the person you have ended a relationship with, especially if that person is a family member.

Loving and liking family members

We tend to love the rest of our family members, like parents, siblings, grandparents, and other extended family members. I have one favorite cousin out of the 22 I have. Just love him. Don’t know why. Perhaps because of the shared outgoing nature we have or the fun we had as kids. Just love him. Can’t help it. The same can be true with other relatives, and usually is true for those in our families of origin: parents and siblings, and perhaps an uncle, aunt, or grandparent who lived with us. Gotta love your family right? Right.

But you may not like ‘em. That’s the problem. You may love them but you may not like them. This is a huge problem, at least for many people. I talked with someone yesterday who hasn’t talked to his brother for years…but still loves him. I heard from a friend that his adult son doesn’t talk with his mother for some reason. And I talk with many people who have great problems with one or more of their family members. In summary, they don’t like someone that they love. My blog on “The Other F word” dealt a bit with the loving/not liking phenomenon. It’s a challenge. You can’t get rid of family as hard as you might try. You don’t have to. But you need to deal with your feelings…all of them.

Dealing with the loving/not liking phenomenon

Here are a couple suggestions for this love him/don’t like him dilemma:

  • Identify the people you love who in your life. Be courageous because you might be surprised how small or how large this group might be
  • Identify the people you like who are in your life. This could be family or friends. They might even be someone you see at the grocery store now and then, or a gal you see across the street.
  • Consider the people who might fall into the love her/don’t like her category. This will usually be family members.
  • Allow yourself the freedom to do the loving and the liking even they don’t seem to fit together.
  • Don’t run off and tell you drug addicted son that you love him but don’t like him, or your brother who is just a loudmouth. Just acknowledge that you don’t like someone whom you feel compelled to love, and perhaps really love.
  • Note the feeling you have with this love/don’t like thing. The feeling will be sadness. The only reason you feel sad is because you love someone and have, for some reason, lost that person, or lost trust in that person, or feel betrayed by that person, or something else. But you still love her. Let it be.

Further reading

Johnson, R. and Brock, D. (2017). The positive power of sadness. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger

Johnson, R. (2018). Feelings I-IV blogs

Johnson, R. (2018, forthcoming). Loving and Liking II: Spouse; Loving and liking III: Children.

The Other N Word

Ron Johnson Connection, emotional maturity, Feelings, men's issues, relationships, Self-Awareness, Uncategorized

I have to be real careful with this blog. It could be very offensive. The “N word” that we all know…unfortunately…is all too rampant in America. Not so, by the way in most of the rest of world, and not even very prevalent in North America. I never heard the N word when I lived in Canada partly because when a man was Black, he didn’t first define himself as Black, but as Canadian, or more likely a Newfoundlander or a Torontonian. This came to as a pleasant surprise when I was at a party with people of various colors and national origins, as Canada tends to be much more than the U.S. Somehow I had a conversation with this Black guy, and it was normal for me to think of him first as a “Black guy.” But that wasn’t how he thought of himself. I learned that he was from Toronto, that he was an engineer of some kind, and that he has a passion for music. Far down the line he would say something like, “Oh, yes, I am Black but that isn’t how I think of myself.” Not so in America…sadly. My two sons–in-law are Black. They were both raised by White mothers, and for one of them, predominantly by mother, and neither was particularly raised in a Black subculture. Blackness is important to both of them, perhaps one more than the other, but it seems not to be at the top of the list.

The N word originated more than 200 years ago and has remained a part of the English language, again, especially in America. It is primarily a derogatory term, but it can be used as a term of endearment among Blacks themselves, or a friendly way of engaging a competitor. I can’t say how that feels because I am not Black, but even this most hateful word can be used lovingly, if carefully. I don’t know how my one my son-in-law really feels when his mother jokingly says to him, “That is mighty White of you.” I cringe, but know that she means this as a term of endearment. This whole discussion reminds me of my previous blogs of Feelings, and it is in that light that I want to talk about “the other N word.” The other N word is need.

Need
Having thought about, read about, and written about feeling words recently, I continue to find myself intrigued by this other N word. Some people use it frequently, some use it sparingly, and yet others never use it Need tends to be a word that is used more by women than by men, but that is only part of the story. People with a feeling-based personality type use it more than people with a thinking-based personality. People with a “lover” temperament use it more than people with an “analyst” temperament. (I’ll discuss these personalities in later blogs.) It amazes me how natural and easy it is for some people to use the word need compared to many people who never use it.

It is important to distinguish between wants and needs. People for whom the N word works well tend not to make the distinction between wants and needs. Their preferred word is need, and this preference suggests that their use of the term includes both wants and needs. This can be confusing for someone who never uses the word need. Given that I am disinclined to use the N word, I always feel a bit uncomfortable when someone uses the word easily and frequently. I am even more uncomfortable when he or she uses it in regards to what they want me to do. Notice how I immediately translated the word “need” to “want” without event thinking. So I have come to realize that this want/need distinction may be a bit artificial. There may be a spectrum of want on one side of the spectrum and need on the other. This may help a bit, but I think the matter is more complicated than that.

I think the word need needs to be used, if sparingly and carefully. There: I used the N word. But I used the N word in regards to what I thought you need. It is much harder for me to use the N word when I have some need. I use it rarely, and I am far from comfortable with using it for myself, much less feeling the felt need that underlies the word need. I am coming to believe that felt need is real important but like any feeling, it is not exactly definable. If you read by blogs on Feelings, you will remember that we know what feelings are but we can’t exactly define them. Such seems to be the case with the N word. There are some dangers in allowing the N word into one’s vocabulary as there are dangers in failing to distinguish between wants and needs. Nobody likes “needy” people.

Neediness
“Neediness” may not be as bad as the original N word, but it is close. Who wants to be around a “needy” person? A “needy” person is someone who gloms on to you and you can’t get away from. You know what I mean. The guy in the gas station who wants to tell you about his sister’s cancer; the relative who always has some kind of physical ailment; the guy you try to avoid because you know that he will want more of your time than you can give him. “Needy” people are dependent. That is the essence of so-called neediness. “Dependent” is not much better than “needy” but it at least strikes a chord in my psychological understanding of things. Not the best word, but somewhat accurate, at least in psychological parlance. Even a bit harsher is the formal diagnosis of “dependent personality disorder,” one of the many diagnoses that is like a death curse.

Instead of needy, dependent, or personality disordered, I suggest that people with this tendency are looking for something. They are looking for what they never received as children. It is natural for children to be needy, 100% in infancy, 90% in toddlerhood, about 50% the rest of childhood, and about 20% in adolescence. Adulthood…well, we’ll get to that in a minute. So-called needy people didn’t get their needs met in these early stages of life and as a result are continually looking for someone to lean on. Unfortunately, they often lean on anyone they can find, and the more they lean, the more that people avoid them or tolerate their neediness. It’s a sad story. They’re just trying to get what they didn’t get as children, but they never get it. Fritz Perls (therapist, largely in the 1960’s time) said it right: you get your childhood dependency needs met in childhood or you never get them met. Note one important phrase in this statement: childhood needs. You get your childhood needs met as a child or you never get them met. Wow. That sounds awful, but this is not the end of the story.

When I failed to get my childhood needs met in childhood, I no longer need them met. I don’t need to have my diapers changed. OK, I’m 75 and may need palliative care someday, but that’s not what I’m talking about. I don’t need to be fed; I don’t need to have a lot of physical comfort; I don’t need to be governed; I don’t need someone near me all the time; and many more childhood needs. When “needy” people are talking on and on or wanting a hug every time we meet or want more than we have to give, they are looking for childhood needs. They don’t know it, but that is what they are actually seeking. And you can’t give them what they need. That is why they keep asking for it and demanding it. They need to give up ever getting their childhood needs met. Then what?

They can get everything they need as adults. Needy people don’t know that, but that is the case. They can be listened to, hugged, cared for, cried with, laughed with, and all that is in a normal adult life. They can get these things, but it is work. And the work begins by giving up on ever getting childhood (and infantile) needs. Needy people need to grieve the loss of childhood needs in order ever to get their adult needs met. I would dare suggest they need to read our The Power of Positive Sadness, or some better book about how to grieve the losses of early life. Then they can face normal adult needs.

Normal adult needs
What are “normal adult needs”? Not an easy question to answer, but an important one to examine. I will not indulge myself in offering a treatise on adult needs, but there are several obvious ones: physical needs, like food, clothing, and shelter. Some people have special needs, while others seem to have few needs. I will simply state that outside of the special needs and physical needs categories there are some psychological needs present in all of us. They roughly fall into the additional categories of need to be alone and the need to be with people. As a result of these two needs, which we might say fall on a continuum, there are many secondary needs, but allow me to speak simply about these two quite different needs: away from people and with people.

I will defer the important discussion of introverted people and extraverted people to a later time, and her focus on what I perceive as natural independence and natural dependence. People who are naturally dependent know that they need people; people who are naturally independent know that they need to be away from people. I’m not talking about extremes, like the hermit who never sees people and seemingly doesn’t want to or the woman who works 80 hours a week and never sees her family…or doesn’t have a family to see. I am talking about these two needs that are quite different and both important.

I tend to be in the “need to be alone” category, the independent person. My wife tends to be of the same ilk. As we speak she is in Utah somewhere climbing and hiking to her heart’s content, while I am doing other things…like writing this blog. Both of us are quite content. Since we are rarely apart and talk incessantly, we need to be away from each other from time to time. I have no idea where she is and what she is going, and for the most part, I don’t care. I just hope she is happy and well and that she comes home when she has had her fill of her beloved canyons. Likewise, she doesn’t really care what I am doing, whether writing, seeing patients, or playing basketball. She just hopes I will hold the fort here and not get hurt on the court. Otherwise, each of us is content to be left alone while we do what we want. But having sung the praises of this independence that we have, I must admit that I am not good at the other side of the spectrum: dependence.

I am slowly, painfully learning to use the “other N word” in my vocabulary, which is an outgrowth of my actually admitting that I have needs. It has been a challenging ride to admit that I “need” anyone, and it has been a good thing for me to do. The need, the true need, the natural need for someone else in my life is now something that I can see without seeing it as needy. God forbid, I don’t want to be needy. I just need. I need Deb in my life. I need my friends in my life. I need a few guys who put up with my less than good skills at basketball. I need my office manager, Cheri, God love her. Unfortunately, she is not in the office to correct my misspellings on this blog, nor is Deb to add and subtract, which is her real art in writing. So I have to do the independent thing and forego my need for someone better than me to assist me in what I don’t do well.

I see many people like me in my office, and they all have the same trouble with the N word. Some feel it; some think it; but very few of them actually say it. I know their difficulty with the N word. But it is a good word. If used carefully.

Further reading
Johnson, R. and Brock, B. (2017). The power of positive sadness. Santa Barbara: Praeger
Johnson, R. (2018). Previous blogs on feelings.
Reik, T. (date?). The need to be loved. (A difficult read)

Feelings IV: Intuition

Ron Johnson Connection, Feelings, relationships, Self-Awareness, Spiritual

This is the fourth in a series of blogs of feelings. Feelings I had to do with identifying basic feelings, namely joy and sorrow, the feelings related to love; and anger and fear, the feelings related to defense. Feelings II dealt with expressing feelings, and Feelings III on hearing feelings. We have granted that the very word “feelings” is nondescript and covers a multitude of things including emotion, and yet feelings remains to be an extremely important concept and central in relationships. In this study we want to discuss what we are generally calling intuition, although we will broaden this concept to some degree. To look at this general category of intuition is to look at what some people say is “a sense of,” “a gut level feeling,” “just knowing” or “just feeling.” Let’s start there.

“Just feeling”
The word “just” is ad adverb, meaning a word that modifies a verb, in this case the verb “feeling.” People use the word “just” when they are trying to convey something that is nebulous but also important. In my evangelical Christian background I used to hear people pray saying something like, “Lord, we just pray that…” which meant that didn’t know exactly how to say what they wanted to say but that the feeling that they had was important. The word “just” is much like the very popular use of “like,” which can be an adverb or an adjective that attempts to convey something nebulous but also important. It can be entertaining to hear a teenager say, “Like, I really, like, like him, like you know, like, what I mean. Like, he may, like, like me to, but like, I’m not, like sure.” This young lady is trying to convey something that is important to her but doesn’t have the words to articulate those feelings so she litters her statement with this filler word hoping to convey the depth of her feeling. People often use the statement, “I just feel” or “I just know,” or more rarely, “I just think” when they want to convey a deep feeling that does not lend itself to exact measurement but remains important to them. Other folks use the phrase “a gut level feeling,” “a sense of,” or perhaps just a “hunch.” I think that the best word, albeit a technical term for this having a hunch is intuition, but there would be many people who would challenge my use of this term, not the least of which some Jungians. However, we convey this matter of intuition, we know that it is a deep feeling, that it is important, and that it doesn’t lend itself to an exact definition. We’re left with trying to give some objective meaning to this very subjective experience. Let’s look at when and why intuition occurs, and then how accurate it is, and how to use it.

When and Why Intuition Occurs

There is great debate over this question ranging from an attempt at a super scientific answer with brain functioning to a “spiritually-based “understanding. Roughly, there appear to be essentially three ways of understanding how someone can have intuition: genetic disposition, spiritual disposition, or acquisition (training). So do some people have this ability while others don’t? I don’t know, but I tend to think so. Certainly, however, anyone can hone their ability to have hunches. The more super scientific way of understanding intuition is to consider that people who are intuitive simply gather more information from the external world more than utilizing information from the internal (personal) world. In general, it appears that while intuition appears to be spontaneous and instantaneous, it probably originates long before the hunch of “feeling” occurs. Specifically, it seems that a person will gather information over a period of time, which could be seconds, minutes, or hours, and then piece this gathered information together in what appears to be a moment, where in fact, the intuition or hunch developed over these seconds, minutes, or hours.

The character Sherlock Holmes was not so much intuitive as we would normally think of when we use the term, but rather someone who had a very well developed ability to notice everything that he saw and heard. So whether or not some people have the “gift” of intuition or not, certainly everyone can hone this ability to see what is happening around them, primarily in what is seen and heard. Yet it may not singularly be what is seen and heard that leads to intuition. There may be a kind of “energy” that transpires between people, an energy, if we use that term, that is very emotional. For instance, haven’t you had the experience of walking into a room and feeling “something”? This feeling may be related to what you saw or heard but it could also be something at a different level, a different one of the five senses, or perhaps this sixth sense that we call intuition.
I should mention tangentially that some people “just feel” so often that they seem to live on these feelings and intuitions, if we even call them such. Some of this kind of intuition is based on the lack of the person’s full personal development, and usually lack of objective success in the world. Hence such a person relies on this “just feeling” something as a way to have life be meaningful when, in fact, his/her life may not be meaningful. I am particularly suspicious about someone saying that they “know” something about another person, or even more tellingly, they know what that person did or should do. People who are inclined to “know” what everyone else should do usually have a lack of self, and as a result live through other people to some degree. The few people who do this kind of “knowing”, however, should not dissuade us from believing that intuition, whatever it is, certainly is valuable.

How accurate is intuition

As you might expect, there are several opinions on this matter, opinions that seem to line up with the scientific orientation that this is all brain functioning, as compared with the more “spiritually”-based folks. I can’t accurately know the answer to the question of how intuition works but probably between these two extremes, meaning that there is undoubtedly a neurological function and some kind of a personal function that remains ethereal. While we can’t say for certain the exact nature of the origin of intuition, we can say a few things about how it operates and how to use it. Some people may have some kind of special gift in this way, but most people who espouse this universal “knowing” are not well adjusted. That having been said, there is much to the accuracy and value of intuition.

I think this: true intuition is never wrong (or perhaps rarely)…with a caveat, actually two caveats. Notably and most importantly, intuition is never (or rarely) wrong if it is not mixed with emotion…any emotion. This means that if you are sad, happy, angry, or afraid (the 4 basic emotions, remember?), you can’t trust your intuition. We literally some swamp land in northern Wisconsin about 13 years ago when we were looking for the cabin that we now have, but we bought this land because it seemed cheap, seemed right, and we liked it. But the better part of wisdom came to us within 24 hours and we were able to cancel the sale. We lost a good sense of intuition in our good feeling of excitement and joy of find a place to build. More often, however, emotion interferes with intuition when people are scared, angry, or sad. A child is scared of the dark and so his/her intuition conjures up ghosts; the man is angry at his wife and conjures up the idea that she is having an affair; the wife conjures up the idea that she will never be happy because she is sad. Conjuring up is not intuition. So the first caveat is that you can’t trust your intuition if you have some strong emotion at the same time.

The second limitation to the accuracy of intuition has to do with objectivity. This means that we may have an intuition that we should do something but we don’t know why we should do it, or we may have an intuition that we shouldn’t do something, but equally we don’t know why. So I would say that the intuition is right, but intuition is by its nature, subjective. Objectivizing something that is intrinsically subjective is often a mistake. If you read my blog on Regrets, you know that I have many, but the outstanding one is the regret I have for getting married to my first wife, now 52 years ago. I knew better. I knew that I didn’t want to marry Sandy. Sandy was and remains a fine person; my feelings then and now have nothing to do with her. Rather, they have to do with my having overridden my intuition that I shouldn’t marry her. At the time, at 22, I wasn’t wise enough, much less trust my feeling enough to honor that intuition. I over road my intuition because I couldn’t objectify it; I couldn’t find any good reason for not marrying Sandy. People tend to objectify some action that is an outgrowth of an intuition, which as I said, is not naturally emotional or concrete.

How to trust and use intuition

These are the principles to keep in mind when having an intuition:
• Intuition is a real thing, not to be dismissed
• It is not objective by nature, so leave an intuition in the subjective realm until if and when some objective action also feels So you have an intuition that something needs to be done, and then you have a later intuition of what needs to be done.
• Be very wary of people who live on hunches, gut feelings, and other forms of intuitions. They may often be spot on, but likely they also mix emotion with intuition.
• So don’t trust your intuition when you are emotional. Don’t trust your thoughts at a time when you are emotional. Let the emotion, particularly sadness, run its course. When that happens, your intuition might be very valuable for you.
• Don’t trust your intuition about someone else, like what he or she should do. Likewise, don’t trust someone else’s intuition about what you should do. This is projection, and rarely accurate, much less helpful.

Further reading
• Hope you have read Feelings I, II, and III
• G. Jung has some good stuff on intuition, but it is substantially different than my ideas
• Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy.